Following the Philadelphia Eagles’ triumphant 40-22 victory over the Kansas City Chiefs in Super Bowl LIX, the team was invited to the White House to commemorate their win. However, the absence of Super Bowl MVP quarterback Jalen Hurts from the celebration garnered significant attention and speculation.
The Official Explanation
According to a White House official, Hurts, along with several other Eagles players, missed the event due to “scheduling conflicts.” This explanation was provided on the condition of anonymity and was not elaborated upon publicly. Despite Hurts’ absence, President Donald Trump praised him during the ceremony, calling him a “terrific guy and terrific player” who delivered “one stellar performance after another” throughout the season .
A Notable Absence
Hurts’ decision to skip the White House visit was particularly noteworthy given his pivotal role in the Eagles’ championship run. His absence, along with that of other key players like wide receivers A.J. Brown and DeVonta Smith, as well as several defensive starters, led to questions about the reasons behind their nonattendance .

Historical Context
This isn’t the first time the Eagles have had a contentious relationship with White House visits. In 2018, following their Super Bowl LII victory, the team was disinvited by President Trump after several players indicated they would not attend due to disagreements over national anthem protests and other issues .
Public Reaction and Speculation
While the official reason for Hurts’ absence was a scheduling conflict, some observers speculated that it might have been a subtle political statement. Hurts had previously been noncommittal when asked about attending the White House ceremony. At the TIME100 Gala, when questioned about his plans, he responded with an awkward “Umm” and did not provide a clear answer .
In contrast, teammate Saquon Barkley attended the White House event and even played golf with President Trump the day before. Barkley addressed criticism on social media by stating, “Maybe I just respect the office, not a hard concept to understand,” emphasizing his respect for the presidency regardless of political affiliation .
Conclusion
Jalen Hurts’ absence from the White House celebration following the Eagles’ Super Bowl LIX victory has sparked discussions about the intersection of sports and politics. While the official explanation cites scheduling conflicts, the lack of a definitive statement from Hurts leaves room for interpretation. As athletes continue to navigate their roles as public figures, decisions like these highlight the complexities they face in balancing personal beliefs with public expectations.